Global warming is an eco religion

by Dr. Ed Berry, also in Daily Inter Lake Op Ed of August 31, 2014

exb170

“Piltdown Man Hoax Is Exposed,” announced the New York Times on November 21, 1953. Yet liberals like Bill Baum believe the global warming hoax because their environmental religion requires it.

Baum hangs his June 29 rebuttal of my March 7 talk on a second hoax perpetuated to support the global warming hoax, namely, that 97 percent of scientists believe human CO2 causes significant global warming.

Consensus is central to politics but irrelevant to science where logic and data prevail. But on the subject of consensus, a simple internet search of “97 percent of scientists” finds a dozen articles that prove the oft-quoted 97-percent claim is an urban myth. [Continue reading] (18)

Professor Steve Running is not a Nobel Laureate

by Dr. Ed Berry

NobelPeaceImageProfessor Steve Running, University of Montana, makes three claims:

  1. He shares the Nobel Peace Prize awarded to Al Gore and the United Nations Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC).
  2. This Nobel Peace Prize means he has scientific expertise in Catastrophic human-caused Climate Change (CAGW).
  3. His expertise extends to the physics of how human emissions of carbon dioxide cause climate change.

Here’s the truth:

  1. Professor Steve Running does not have a Nobel Peace Prize.
  2. A Nobel Peace Prize means nothing about expertise in science.
  3. At the IPCC, Running was part of Working Group Two, “Impacts, Adaptation and Vulnerability“, that has 20 Chapters. Running worked on Chapter 14 which pertains to possible effects of CAGW in North America, assuming CAGW is true.
  4. Running’s expertise is in Forest Ecophysiology, Forest Management, and Botany.
  5. Running is not a physicist and he was not a part of IPCC Working Group One, “The Physical Science Basis” which pertains to the causes and validity of CAGW.
  6. Therefore, Professor Steve Running has no professional claim to expertise on the causes and validity of CAGW.

[Continue reading] (16)

Simple Proof AGW is False

by Howard C. Hayden, Professor Emeritus of Physics, UConn, October 27, 2009

AGWHoaxThe Honorable Lisa P. Jackson, Administrator
Environmental Protection Agency
1200 Pennsylvania Ave., NW Washington, DC 20460

Dear Administrator Jackson:

I write in regard to the Proposed Endangerment and Cause or Contribute Findings for Greenhouse Gases Under Section 202(a) of the Clean Air Act, Proposed Rule, 74 Fed. Reg. 18,886 (Apr. 24, 2009), the so-called “Endangerment Finding.”

It has been often said that the “science is settled” on the issue of CO2 and climate. Let me put this claim to rest with a simple one-letter proof that it is false.

The letter is “s”, the one that changes model into models. If the science were settled, there would be precisely one model, and it would be in agreement with measurements. [Continue reading] (4377)

The Skeptics Case in 12 minutes

httpvh://youtu.be/0gDErDwXqhc
by Dr. David M.W. Evans, February 20, 2013

“We check the main predictions of the climate models against the best and latest data. Fortunately the climate models got all their major predictions wrong. Why? Every serious skeptical scientist has been consistently saying essentially the same thing for over 20 years, yet most people have never heard the message. Here it is, put simply enough for any lay reader willing to pay attention…” [Continue reading] (3664)

Global Warming is not due to human CO2

by Dr. Tim Ball, CanadianFreePress, February 5, 2007 Global Warming, as we think we know it, doesn't exist. And I am not the only one trying to make people open up their eyes and see the truth. But few listen, despite the fact that I was one of … [Continue reading]

Global Warming and the Ideology of Anthropogenic (Human Caused) Climate Change

by James Divine, Global Research The purpose of this work is to provide an investigation into the ideology of anthropogenic (human caused) climate change. It has been written with the confidence that further research within the public, as well … [Continue reading]

Star Size Comparison

httpvh://youtu.be/XE0aAZE0kp4 … [Continue reading]

Temperature, not our emissions, controls CO2

MarkMorano

by Marc Morano, ClimateDepot.com [Note: The below is a longer and updated version of the article in May 14, 2013 in Human Events.] The level of carbon dioxide, a trace essential gas in the atmosphere that humans exhale from our mouths, has … [Continue reading]

The Surprising Power of a Solar Storm

httpvh://youtu.be/EEFQHDSYP1I … [Continue reading]

Dr. Don Easterbrook on Climate Change to Washington State Senate

[Continue reading]

Questions for Professor Doug Coffin, Sponsor of HJ 10

by Dr. Ed Berry Rep Doug Coffin (D), Missoula, Professor of Molecular Biology at the U of Montana, sponsored HJ 10. I presented my rebuttal to the Montana House Committee on Natural Resources on February 13, 2011. Whereas some proponents of … [Continue reading]

Montana HJ-10 Rebuttal

by Dr. Ed Berry I presented this rebuttal to the Montana House Committee on Natural Resources on February 13, 2011. You may download the PDF I prepared for the committee. Rep Doug Coffin (D), Missoula, Professor of Molecular Biology at the U of … [Continue reading]

German Scientists change on Global Warming

WinterIndex

by Klaus-Eckart Puls and Sebastian Lüning (translated, edited by P Gosselin, No Tricks Zone) Currently this 2012/13 winter in Germany and over large parts of Europe we’ve been finding lots of cold, snow and ice -  the fifth winter of this type in … [Continue reading]

German Professor: Decades of Cooling: “Climate protection is ineffective”

HorstMalbergA200

by P Gosselin, NoTricksZone Meteorologist Prof. Dr. Horst Malberg has an article posted at the European Institute for Climate and Energy (EIKE) here. He tells us we ought to be preparing for a cooler 21st century first half. Professor Malberg … [Continue reading]

Montana HJ 10: “Overwhelming scientific evidence” …?

Hearing for HJ 10 is scheduled for: Wednesday, Feb 13, 3 p.m., Rm 172, Helena Rep Doug Coffin (D), Missoula, introduced HJ 10. Information about Rep Doug Coffin is here and here. The HJ 10 legislative draft is here. Continuing Bill information will … [Continue reading]

115 Scientists: There is no basis for Climate Alarm

We, the undersigned scientists, maintain that the case for alarm regarding climate change is grossly overstated. Surface temperature changes over the past century have been episodic and modest and there has been no net global warming for over a … [Continue reading]

Apollo Era NASA Retirees say Climate Science not settled

by The Right Climate Stuff Research Team January 23, 2013 There are competing points of view regarding the causes of climate change in our current environment. One group has concluded that human activities in the burning of fossil fuels have … [Continue reading]

UK Met Office falsifies Global Warming hypothesis

by Dr. Ed Berry The UK Met Office developed a new version of its climate model, since the old one did not make accurate predictions. Their new climate model predicts no further global warming out to 2017, the 5-year limit of its forecast. Based … [Continue reading]

The Changing Arctic: Monthly Weather Review 1922

Spetzbergen2

Monthly Weather Review, November 1922, page 589. (See NOAA PDF here.) by George Nicolas IFFT (Under the date of October 10, 1922, the American consul at Bergen, Norway, submitted the following report to the State Department, Washington, … [Continue reading]

View the Enormous Power of Nature

GlacierFall600

[Continue reading]

Open Letter to UN Secretary-General: No reason to restrict CO2, Climate models are wrong

Published by Financial Post (and also here since I am a signer - Ed) Policy actions that aim to reduce CO2 emissions are unlikely to influence future climate. Policies need to focus on preparation for, and adaptation to, all dangerous climatic … [Continue reading]

Lindzen: Climate Science Isn’t Settled

by Prof. Richard S. Lindzen, also published in WSJ Is there a reason to be alarmed by the prospect of global warming? Consider that the measurement used, the globally averaged temperature anomaly (GATA), is always changing. Sometimes it goes up, … [Continue reading]

Open Letter to US Senate opposing AAAS Letter

Open Letter to the United States Senate You have recently received a letter from the American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS), purporting to convey a “consensus” of the scientific community that immediate and drastic action is … [Continue reading]

Open Letter to American Physical Society

Regarding the National Policy Statement on Climate Change of the APS Council: As physicists who are familiar with the science issues, and as current and past members of the American Physical Society, we the undersigned urge the Council to … [Continue reading]

50 Astronauts and scientists tell NASA: Stop global warming advocacy

HOUSTON, TX – April 10, 2012 Leighton Steward's lectures to ex-NASA scientists at the Space Center in Houston resulted in this joint letter from 50 former NASA scientists and astronauts. Steward found 90 percent of the scientists disagree with the … [Continue reading]

Climate models exaggerate the effects of CO2

by William Happer, Professor of Physics, Princeton University, WSJ During a fundraiser in Atlanta earlier this month, President Obama is reported to have said: "It gets you a little nervous about what is happening to global temperatures. When it … [Continue reading]

Concerned Scientists Reply on Global Warming

Open Letter from scientists, Wall Street Journal [Open Letter #4: Authors of Open Letter #1 reply to Open Letters #2 and #3.] The interest generated by our Wall Street Journal op-ed of Jan. 27, "No Need to Panic about Global Warming," is … [Continue reading]

American Physical Society Responds

Open Letter #3 from APS President, Wall Street Journal [This letter also responds to Open Letter #1] The Jan. 27 op-ed "No Need to Panic About Global Warming" is inaccurate in its characterization of the Climate Change Statement of the American … [Continue reading]

Check With Climate Scientists for Views on Climate

Open Letter #2 from Opposing Scientists, Wall Street Journal [This letter responds to Open Letter #1 below.] Do you consult your dentist about your heart condition? In science, as in any area, reputations are based on knowledge and expertise in … [Continue reading]

No need to panic about Global Warming

Open Letter #1 from Scientists, Wall Street Journal [Several signors to this letter contributed to the exhibits used by Climate Physics LLC in its successful Intervention of the Climate Petition by Our Children's Trust, which would have forced the … [Continue reading]